Ever notice how scrolling through social media can feel like stepping into a house of mirrors? Everything seems louder, brighter, and perfectly filtered until suddenly you’re comparing your real life to everyone else’s highlight reel and feeling worse for it. As it turns out, that scroll might not just be making you lose time – it might be messing with your mind. That idea has been getting some serious buzz lately, and according to Psychologist Jonathan Haidt, it’s hitting liberal girls the hardest.
Social Media Triggers
What Haidt meant, and what a growing body of research is showing, is that young liberal women appear especially vulnerable to mental health problems tied to heavy social media use. But before you say social media is evil, there’s a lot more to it.
Haidt argues that girls, especially those identifying as liberal, tend to spend significantly more time on social media than their male or conservative peers – and Haidt isn’t the only one saying that. A recent report from the think tank Manhattan Institute suggests that liberal girls are more likely than boys and conservatives to report frequent social media use and to say they encounter content that makes them feel depressed or lonely.
A big part of this issue comes down to personality traits – not political signs in your yard, not who your favorite candidate is, but things like emotional openness, sensitivity to fairness, and higher empathy. These can all be more diplomatic ways of saying “triggered.”
The idea is pretty simple: If you’re more emotionally open and more tuned in to social issues, you’re more likely to take online negativity to heart. And what the researchers found is that liberal girls and young women consistently report the biggest spikes in anxiety, depression, and loneliness – exactly what Haidt meant in his RealClearPolitics interview when he said liberal girls “rise first and fastest on depression.”
If you’ve spent even five minutes on social media, this probably doesn’t feel far-fetched. You can scroll past an adorable cat video, a wedding announcement, and then suddenly slam right into a panic-inducing political thread that’s one emoji away from a meltdown. Pick almost any X (formerly Twitter) post about politics and you can see how fast emotions run hot.
For someone who already feels emotionally raw or justice-oriented, these kinds of posts don’t just “scroll by.” They linger, and they hit harder.
A lot of people want to jump straight to “liberalism causes depression” or “conservatives are emotionally tougher,” but the research doesn’t say that. What it does say is that the personality traits associated with more liberal young women overlap with those aligned with mental-health vulnerability. In other words: Liberalism doesn’t create the sensitivity, the sensitivity may lean people toward liberalism. Correlation, not causation, as the Manhattan Institute explained.
The political angle creeps in because of how social media works. It doesn’t matter if you’re liberal, conservative, or allergic to politics entirely; these platforms reward emotion. High emotion gets clicks, comments, shares, and outrage. And people naturally follow accounts that already match what they think.
When algorithms keep feeding your own beliefs back at you, and do it with a megaphone, polarization becomes inevitable. You start to think the people on “the other side” are either villains or idiots because you never actually see them as full humans – only as the worst performing posts about them.
Haidt and several other researchers have been warning that this structure is bad for both individual mental health and democracy. “Social media is incredibly powerful for tearing things down,” Haidt said in a 2022 interview on WBUR. “In an ailing democracy like ours where our institutions need to be improved — not ripped apart — it generally has made things worse.”
Some teens use social media to find community, talk about shared experiences, or just laugh at memes. Others use it for activism, connection, or support during difficult times. The issue is that certain groups are simply affected – perhaps even “triggered” – by the negative side.
The timing matters, too. The teen mental health crisis didn’t just appear overnight. Rates of anxiety and depression among youths began climbing sharply in the early 2010s, right when smartphones and social media went from optional hobbies to near-mandatory life accessories.
At the same time, social justice activism exploded online, especially among younger Americans. Issues like race, gender identity, climate change, and political outrage became major drivers of TikTok and Instagram content. The Manhattan Institute report links this moment to what Haidt calls the “Great Awokening” – a huge cultural shift fueled by social media amplifying high-emotion, justice-focused content.
When platforms reward anger, fear, and moral outrage with more visibility, it’s easy to see how people might burn out faster and get overwhelmed by the nonstop flood.
When you zoom out, social media starts to look like a chaotic carnival nobody remembers buying a ticket for. The lights are blinding, the noise never ends, and every turn throws another mirror in your face, daring you to compare yourself to others. For many young, liberal women, those mirrors bend reality just enough to spark a whole chain reaction of irritation, anxiety, and outrage. They’re quicker to get rattled, not because they’re dramatic, but because they spend more time in the carnival and take its funhouse reflections more personally than the average passerby.
