Most agree that political correctness, as it used to be termed, has gone a bit too far. When kids are chastised in school because they use the wrong pronoun – not on purpose, of course – you know this idea has overstepped. Now that people demand to be called by their preferred pronouns, there is a problem: One cannot always tell someone’s preferred identity just by looking at them. In the UK, a nurse was reprimanded for calling a biological male prisoner – who is a pedophile and transgender – the masculine pronoun and ultimately lost her job. However, there’s good news for free speech for our friends across the pond as the nurse was rehired and the case against was her dropped.
A Free Speech Win
Jennifer Melle worked for 12 years for the National Health Service (NHS) at Epsom and St. Helier University Hospitals Trust. During that time, according to reports, she’d had a perfect record – until one of her patients, a transgender pedophile, took issue with her calling him by male pronouns. Instead of just filing a complaint, the patient allegedly let fly racial slurs – Melle is a black woman – as well as physical threats to the point that security got involved.
Melle said she told her patient, “Sorry I cannot refer to you as ‘her’ or ‘she,’ as it’s against my faith and Christian values, but I can call you by your name.”
As The Times reported, “Campaigners from Christian Concern said that, ‘despite being the victim,’ Melle was given a written warning and referred by the trust to the Nursing and Midwifery Council as a “’potential risk’ for not using the patient’s preferred identity.”
Then, in May 2025, when nurse spoke to the media, she was removed from duty, summoned to an “informal” meeting, and told she was being investigated for a potential data breach. She was immediately suspended from her job and escorted from the hospital, banned from returning. It’s taken several months, but the trust has now dropped its disciplinary action against Melle, and she has her job back.
“You know what, I just bursted into tears, and shaking, I said, ‘Thank you Lord.’ This is such an incredible moment of my life,” the nurse said. “And seeing that we have victory … we urge [Secretary of State for Health and Social Care] Wes Streeting now to put in the policies immediately!”
Last spring, the UK high court ruled that transgender women do not fit the definition of women under the 2010 Equality Act.
Melle may have her work record cleared now and her job back, but she is not finished. According to Townhall, she confirmed she is continuing with legal action, with the support of the Christian Legal Centre, against the trust, citing claims of harassment, discrimination, and victimization as well as attacks on her freedom of thought, conscience, and religion. The case is set to be heard in April at an employment tribunal.
Although not an issue of freedom of speech, the UK recently celebrated another win regarding transgender politics. This month, NHS bosses were found guilty of “violating the dignity” of seven female nurses after allowing a transgender co-worker into their changing room.
“By requiring the female nurses to share a changing room, the tribunal judge said, trust managers had ‘engaged in unwanted conduct’ and that their policy had the effect of ‘violating the dignity’ of the nurses and creating ‘a hostile, humiliating and degrading environment’,” The Times reported. Furthermore, “The judge, Seamus Sweeney, who was part of a three-strong panel, found that the trust had behaved unlawfully ‘by not taking seriously and declining to address’ the nurses’ concerns, which had been raised in 2023 and 2024.”
The judges considered last year’s Supreme Court decision that “for the purposes of equality legislation, the definition of a woman is rooted in biology – and that even trans women who hold gender recognition certificates are not legally allowed to enter women-only spaces,” the outlet explained.
After the ruling was handed down, one of the nurses, Bethany Hutchison, described the decision as “a victory for common sense and for every woman who simply wants to feel safe at work.” She said that “women deserve access to single-sex spaces without fear or intimidation. Forcing us to undress in front of a man was not only degrading but dangerous. Today’s ruling sends a clear message: the NHS cannot ignore women’s rights in the name of ideology.”
Speaking outside the Epsom Gateway building in Surrey, Melle said: “The recent legal victory for the Darlington nurses shows that sanity and common sense are beginning to return to the NHS. It marks a turning point. No nurse should have to endure what the Darlington nurses experienced, what Sandie Peggie endured, or what I have faced. None of us should be penalised for speaking the truth, standing by our professional judgment, or living according to our deeply held beliefs.” She added: “I now look forward to the full employment tribunal in April.
Together, these cases highlight a straightforward point: People should not be punished at work for acknowledging basic reality or for raising reasonable concerns. In Melle’s case, it was about being disciplined for words she used to address a male by a male pronoun. In the case of the seven nurses, it was about being forced into a situation that made them feel unsafe and ignored. Neither was about hatred or cruelty, yet both resulted in workers being sidelined for refusing to go along with ideology. The recent rulings suggest the UK is beginning to pull back from that approach, drawing clearer lines between respect and compulsion. For many, this feels like a long-overdue reminder that common sense still matters and that free speech and basic workplace rights should not disappear the moment someone clocks in.
